Robot Camera Serial Numbers !!BETTER!!
CLICK HERE >>>>> https://urllio.com/2th1x4
As to the name Robot, I am not quite sure that in the early 1930s one thought of robots the same way as we do now, but the advertising brochures did show a robot-like creature. Perhaps these were wind-up toys that could walk by themselves I can only assume that the camera was named that way because of its similar automatic features and needed winding up.
A rather rare black Robot II was also produced, in fact in at least two different varieties. One version had a larger wind knob which allowed up to fifty photos for one wind cycle, this model was used by the German airforce (Luftwaffe) and had serial numbers starting with an F, e.g., F50039-6. Another version was identical to regular Robot II but with black painted top and bottom plates and often a black wind knob. They had regular Robot II serial numbers, five digits preceded by a letter B, but often had a single digit suffix of which the meaning is not clear to me. They came most commonly with a CZJ Tessar lens marked f=3 cm, which is an updated version of the Tessar found on the Robot I.
Black version of the Robot II with uncoated Carl Zeiss Tessar 37.5mm f/3.5 lens and double-sized spring windknob. Based on the serial number of the lens, this Robot appears to be an early pre-war version of around 1938. The camera looks like it has been partially repainted, but it was probably black originally.The Tessar on this Robot was a great little lens, it even had click stops on the focus ring so one could focus the lens without taking your eye off the viewfinder, once you memorised where the click stops were. This camera was truly build for speed.
In the 1960s and 1970s Robot increasingly moved to making specialty cameras for industrial, scientific and surveillance use, for which purposes the Robot Recorder was introduced. This was essentially a Robot Royal without viewfinder or film rewind, but usually with an electric motor drive. Many different variants exists depending on designated use, such a traffic surveillance, scientific or medical applications, etc., and had add-ons such as remote electronic shutter release and large-volume film magazines. The Robot company became more and more specialised, leaving the consumer market behind completely, and produced cameras until well into the 1990s, after which it was amalgamated in the Jenoptik group, to which the weblink robot.de now refers.
Hello GodfreyYour \"Robot Star II\" is a Robot II.The Robot Star has a Rewindspool a you can put in the Filmpatrone direct in and was later made.You can look at the series number over the Shutter to see if it was militär used if it number got at the end -5 -6 -7-8 it was in Militär used.Your robot must have a the beginning a the number B for Robot II.You got the equipment to spool the film in the T-Kassette and spool it back in the filmpatrone.You develop the film selfPlease remain that you use with these Optik a Black and White Film the Zeiss Biotar is not coated.And use a lens Hood is sensitive to Backlight.When you need a repair for the shutter then ask Fritz Kerglinfo@robot-kameradienst.dewww.robot-kameradienst.deHe also can make a change at you camera that you can put in the normal 35mm Filmpatrone direct inside like the Robot IIa or the Junior.Then you only open the backboard under a cover an spool the Film into a the Filmpatrone.Have fun with your Robot and use it to take picturesIf you want to buy Robot Royal 24x24 to take picture.Asked me before you buy there is a Version with transport Problems( free open motor spool).By the Robot Royal 36 there is no problem.Best RegardsChrisOriginally posted ages ago. (permalink) blauchristoph (a group admin) edited this topic ages ago.
Hello Chris! Thanks for the correction on the name ... I edited my post. :-)The serial number on this Robot II is B35200-6. I generally only shoot B&W with film cameras these days ... I'm familiar with shooting using uncoated lenses. Yes, I process the film myself, and one roll at a time is fine for my purposes. It might be convenient to convert it to the later spec, though, so I'll keep that in mind. I'm sure the shutter speeds are off so it will need to go in for service at some point. I have both the proper cartridges: I did a test load the other evening and the film transport seems to be working perfectly, now I'm loading up a fresh roll of film to use on my morning walk. I would like a Robot Royal with the same 24x24 format ... I have plenty of 24x36 cameras, prefer the square format. I've been talking to fellow who has one for sale that looks to be in very nice shape: it's a Robot Royal 24 Model III, serial number G-116491. It has the closed take-up spool (looks to be the same as the II take up) and the Schneider Xenar 38mm f/2.8 lens. Is this one worth going forthanks again!Godfreyages ago(permalink)
There is no question that it would be much better to find the precise matrix between the cameras automatically. In the meanwhile, after a lot of fiddling around, I was relatively satisfied with the following numbers:
The Germany military purchased mainly Robot IIs. The airforce got the model F-XXXXX-N models. During the war the production was moved for strategic reasons use so even the B's were numbered B-XXXXX-N. Among the airfoce (Luftwaffe) IIs were those with tall and those with regular winder. Some later models did not get viewfinders and some did not get flash connectors. None of these are really that rare as about 20,000 were made and many survived. No all F-series Robots btw. were black. Some were not made black and others got their black removed and were updated by Robot into civilian cameras after the war. Many \"black robots\" that one sees were not black and some got their \"Luftwaffe Eigentum\" added at later dates (some don't even have correct serial numbers).
There are many fake military Robots around but they are generally just Robot IIs (most even post-war production since civilian cameras were pre-war almost exclusively with single springs) with engravings and black paint and so relatively easy to spot by their intact serial numbers and other design bits (such as chrome under the black paint on the lower edges of the camera). Since there were more military tall winder model II cameras made than civilian (there were, at most, a few hundred of these made) most (but not all!) of the \"fakes\" are with the single spring (normal winder) and B-series (most not even wartime B-XXX-N but many even postwar serial numbers). Single spring F-series Robot cameras are much rarer. Also note: Not all army cameras were black!
Some might ask: Why are the Robot military cameras if so significant from a photographic/military technological perspective and not made (and survived) in numbers greater than the Leicas (short winder are much rarer) worth so much less Why is it that a \"Nazi Leica\" (most are Russian) or Minox (ALL are fake!) can often fetch more than a F-series Robot Why is it that Leica cameras (real ones, albeit mostly NOT of those made for the military) with Nazi graffiti seem to attract so much $$$ Those cameras are not about a piece of technological or military history but a kind of souvenir (the real military Leicas) or fan article (the fakes). I suspect its the lure of evil.
In the final assembly process, Cognex serial number and barcode reading solutions help reduce the number of defective mobile wearable devices entering the supply chain by minimizing the incidence of scrap parts and improving production efficiency. As mobile and wearable devices shrink in size, so do the components that go into them, including barcode labels used for traceability and process control during the assembly process. Manufacturers can experience losses every year when inaccurate parts are assembled and wrong operations are performed on assembly lines with thousands of different intermixed part numbers.
In the case that you forget the password for you device in which you will not be able to access the web page, and the camera is too high up to reach to find the sticker, you can use 2M Tool to find the serial number. 2M Tool does not automatically show the number; you must force it to show. First, you will need to click on the Settings icon to show the options:
Panasonic USA has issued a statement in response to concerns on the DPReview.com forum about Lumix DMC-G7 serial numbers rubbing off. The statement aims to reassure customers, pointing out that the problem does not indicate that the cameras are not genuine and confirming that camera warranties are still valid, so long as you retain proof of purchase and the label from the camera box that states the serial number.
Oh, my......people freak like they are paying Leica prices. Come on guys! This is a cheap camera to start with. It'll be worth $50 after a couple years of use. Who needs a serial number on a disposable product. On the other hand, people should just go out, shoot and stop worrying about labels. The only people not worried are the ones in the field using their cameras.
I purchased three post 2008 Nikkors FX made in Japan few months ago. I'm surprise that the serial numbers are printed on the boxes but not on the lenses. However, the SN are engraved on my DX lenses, the boxes, and the registration cards.
My Nikon cameras serial number is printed on a metallic label located out of the way in a recess at the bottom. Similarly recent Nikon lenses have their serial number in a metallic label located in a recess on the bottom of the lens body. Earlier Nikon SLR bodies and lenses have their serial numbers directly engraved on the body.
Serial numbers are bad enough, but the labels on the various buttons on several camera bodies (and lenses) also wear off. I have taken to covering them with clear coat nail polish (very carefully). This is disappointing on otherwise expensive and well made equipment (like a D800 or GH4). 153554b96e
https://www.destinydentalap.com/forum/medical-forum/windows-server-2003-r2-serial-key-free-download
https://www.respectvn.com/forum/stand-out-from-the-crowd/panotour-pro-2-5-12-crack
https://www.scmalesherbes.com/group/fan-team/discussion/b176c8f2-acf3-43de-b64e-a04d91b4a984